Collecteral
Get a free report

Community property states and the spouse who did not sign

In some states, whether your debtor is married changes what a creditor can collect, and each state's statute draws that line its own way. This page sets the statutes side by side, state by state, and takes each rule from that state's own words. Nothing here is legal advice, and none of it tells you which state your file falls under. That is the first thing to settle, and it is not settled here.

Where each rule comes from, and Florida's opt-in

There is no single community property rule. There are several. Setting them next to each other is the only honest way to answer the question, one state at a time.

What counts as community property is drawn differently in each place. Idaho calls all other property acquired after marriage by either spouse community property, and goes further than most: the income of all property, separate or community, is community too, unless the deed that acquired it or a written agreement of both spouses says otherwise. Idaho Code 32-906(1)1. Louisiana's list is longer, running from property acquired through either spouse's effort during the regime to all other property the law does not class as separate. La. Civ. Code art. 23382. Wisconsin does not use the phrase at all. Its statute says 'marital property', and this page uses the word the statute uses, because the two are not interchangeable when a is at stake.

Florida is a surprise. It is not a community property state by default, but it lets a married couple make property community by putting it in a trust that says so, and the couple need not live in Florida, nor even one of them. Fla. Stat. 736.1505(1)3. The trust is not a handshake. It has to declare itself a community property trust under the Act, have at least one qualified trustee, be signed by both spouses with a trust's formalities, and carry the statutory warning in capital letters at the top. Fla. Stat. 736.15034. And it only counts if it was created or last changed on or after July 1, 2021. Fla. Stat. 736.1502(2)5.

For a creditor, the consequence is where the money sits. A debt one spouse alone incurred, before or during the marriage, may be satisfied from that spouse's one-half share of the trust, unless the trust gives more. Fla. Stat. 736.1506(1)6. A debt both spouses incurred during the marriage may be satisfied from the whole trust. Fla. Stat. 736.1506(2). Both of those bow to the exemption in the Florida Constitution, which the section names first. And trust property can still be the couple's homestead if it would have qualified in their own names. Fla. Stat. 736.151(1)7. Property distributed out of the trust stops being community property, except for what another jurisdiction already classed that way. Fla. Stat. 736.1505(5).

One thing this page will not hand you. Which states are community property states, and which others let couples opt in, is a list no section here supplies. Florida's trust is the one opt-in route these statutes describe, and naming any other would be a guess. The map below shows only the states whose statutes appear on this page.

A United States map showing the states whose statutes this page quotes. California, Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Washington, Idaho and Louisiana are marked as states whose statute shields a spouse's separate property from the other spouse's debt, with exceptions. Wisconsin is marked as a state using the term marital property. Nevada is marked as a state whose statute here covers only debts contracted before the marriage. Florida is highlighted as a state that lets couples opt into community property by trust. All other states and the District of Columbia are not shown.

The marked states are only those whose statutes appear on this page. Florida is highlighted because it reaches community property through a trust rather than by default.

Community and separate debts

The pattern under every statute is the same shape with different edges: community property tends to answer broadly, separate property of the non-signing spouse much less so. The edges are where cases are won.

California casts the community net wide. The community estate answers for a debt either spouse incurred before or during marriage, no matter who manages the property and no matter whether one or both are named on the debt or the judgment. Cal. Fam. Code 910(a)8. There is a seam in the timing: 'during marriage' stops at the date of separation and does not resume until a judgment of dissolution or legal separation. Cal. Fam. Code 910(b). The other spouse's separate property is the harder target. It is not liable for a debt the person's spouse incurred, Cal. Fam. Code 913(b)(1)9, and joining in an of community property does not change that unless the person also incurred the debt. Cal. Fam. Code 913(b)(2). The exception is necessaries of life: there, under Cal. Fam. Code 91410, the spouse is personally liable and separate property may be reached.

Texas sorts by who manages what. A spouse's separate property is not subject to the other spouse's liabilities unless both are liable by other rules of law. Tex. Fam. Code 3.202(a)11. Community property under a spouse's sole or joint management answers for that spouse's debts; community property under one spouse's sole management does not answer for the other spouse's premarital or nontortious debts unless both are personally liable. Tex. Fam. Code 3.202(b). All community property answers for either spouse's torts during marriage. Tex. Fam. Code 3.202(d). And the spouse who did not sign is personally liable only if the other acted as agent or incurred a debt for necessaries; marriage alone does not make one spouse the other's agent. Tex. Fam. Code 3.201(a)12. A divorce order reassigning community debts does not bind a creditor who was never in the case.

Arizona, New Mexico and Washington each set an order rather than a yes or no. Arizona says either spouse may contract community debts, the spouses must be sued jointly, and such a debt is satisfied first from community property and then from the separate property of the spouse who contracted it. A.R.S. 25-215(D)13. New Mexico runs a two-track order: a community debt comes from community and jointly held property, then the residence, then the contracting spouse's separate property; a separate debt comes from that spouse's separate property, then that spouse's half of the community, with the residence last. NMSA 40-3-11(A)14, NMSA 40-3-10(A)15. Those priorities have to be claimed, or they are waived as between the spouse and the creditor. Washington frees each spouse from the other's premarital and separate debts, but a separate debt other than child support or maintenance can reach a spouse's earnings only if reduced to judgment within 3 years of the marriage. RCW 26.16.20016.

Idaho, Louisiana, Wisconsin and Nevada round out the row, each in its own words. Either Idaho spouse may bind the community, but a community obligation one spouse incurred without the other's written consent does not reach the non-consenting spouse's separate property. Idaho Code 32-91217. Louisiana lets a separate or community obligation be satisfied from community property and from the separate property of the spouse who incurred it. La. Civ. Code art. 234518. Wisconsin presumes an obligation incurred during marriage was incurred in the interest of the marriage or family, and such an obligation reaches all marital property and all other property of the incurring spouse; other obligations reach only that spouse's non-marital property and then that spouse's share of marital property. Wis. Stat. 766.5519. Nevada protects a spouse's property from the other's premarital debts, NRS 123.05020, and here the limit bites: the Nevada section covers only debts contracted before the marriage. What answers for a debt one Nevada spouse incurs during the marriage is a question the statute does not reach, and this page will not guess at it.

What the deed shows

The deed is where most readers look first. The statutes below say what some of its words do, and not one of them makes a deed answer every question.

In community property states the vesting line is a starting presumption. Texas presumes property either spouse possesses during or on dissolution of marriage is community, rebuttable only by clear and convincing evidence. Tex. Fam. Code 3.00321. It also reads title as a sign of who manages: property held in a spouse's name is presumed under that spouse's sole management, and a third person dealing with that spouse may rely on the apparent authority, absent fraud or notice of its lack. Tex. Fam. Code 3.10422. California presumes all property a married person acquires during marriage while domiciled there is community. Cal. Fam. Code 76023. A separate evidence rule presumes the holder of legal title owns the full beneficial title, rebuttable only by clear and convincing proof. Cal. Evid. Code 66224. Which prevails when the deed's words and the community presumption collide is not settled by any section here.

California adds a trap for the creditor who reads a joint-tenancy deed and relaxes. Property the spouses acquired during marriage in joint form is presumed community, but only for dividing property on dissolution or legal separation, and a clear statement in the deed rebuts it. Cal. Fam. Code 258125. That presumption is written for divorcing spouses. Reading it as a creditor's rule is reading it for the wrong case.

Idaho uses the deed to move property out of the community's reach. Property one spouse conveys to the other is presumed the 's separate estate, and only the need sign, but the income stays community unless the deed says otherwise. Idaho Code 32-906(2). Property made separate this way, or by written agreement, is not liable for the other spouse's debts. Idaho Code 32-906(1). And community real estate cannot be sold or encumbered unless both spouses join in the instrument, absent an express power of attorney. Idaho Code 32-912.

Wisconsin and New Mexico both guard the spouse who did not sign. Wisconsin lets spouses title property as marital or as a named spouse's individual property, and a joint-tenancy title between spouses makes survivorship marital property while a tenancy in common makes it marital property. Wis. Stat. 766.6026. A Wisconsin judgment lien does not attach to property held by the debtor's spouse and not by the debtor unless the conditions in Wis. Stat. 806.15(4)27 are met, and a lien on survivorship marital property does not defeat the survivor's right unless execution issued before death. Wis. Stat. 766.60(5)(c). New Mexico draws the brightest line of all: unless both spouses joined in writing in creating a post-marital debt, a judgment on it creates no lien on, and cannot be executed against, the non-joining spouse's interest in the marital residence. NMSA 40-3-11(B). A deed tells you the ownership form. It does not tell you who signed the debt, which is the fact that decides the house. The other ownership form that turns on a marriage and hides from the is covered in tenancy by the entireties. Which state's statute the marriage falls under, and whose name is on the obligation, are the two facts your own file answers.

Sources

Every section named above, with how current the text we read was. Read any of them yourself.

  1. Idaho Code 32-906, COMMUNITY PROPERTY, INCOME FROM SEPARATE AND COMMUNITY PROPERTY, CONVEYANCE BETWEEN SPOUSES. (1) All other property ac. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  2. La. Civ. Code art. 2338, VI, Art. 2338. Community property. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  3. Fla. Stat. 736.1505, Classification of property as community property; enforcement; duration; management and control; effect of distributions. 2026 Florida Statutes. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  4. Fla. Stat. 736.1503, Requirements for community property trust. 2026 Florida Statutes. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  5. Fla. Stat. 736.1502, Definitions. 2026 Florida Statutes. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  6. Fla. Stat. 736.1506, Satisfaction of obligations. 2026 Florida Statutes. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  7. Fla. Stat. 736.151, Homestead property. 2026 Florida Statutes. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  8. Cal. Fam. Code 910, California Code, Family Code - FAM § 910. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  9. Cal. Fam. Code 913, California Code, Family Code - FAM § 913. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  10. Cal. Fam. Code 914, California Code, Family Code - FAM § 914. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  11. Tex. Fam. Code 3.202, Rules of Marital Property Liability. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  12. Tex. Fam. Code 3.201, Spousal Liability. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  13. A.R.S. 25-215, Marital and Domestic Relations § 25-215. Liability of community property and separate property for community and separate debts. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  14. NMSA 40-3-11, Domestic Affairs § 40-3-11. Priorities for satisfaction of community debts. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  15. NMSA 40-3-10, Domestic Affairs § 40-3-10. Priorities for satisfaction of separate debts. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  16. RCW 26.16.200, Domestic Relations § 26.16.200. Debts incurred before marriage or domestic partnership--Separate debts--Child support obligation--Liability. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  17. Idaho Code 32-912, Domestic Relations § 32-912. Control of community property. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  18. La. Civ. Code art. 2345, VI, Art. 2345. Satisfaction of obligation during community. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  19. Wis. Stat. 766.55, 765 to 770) § 766.55. Obligations of spouses. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  20. NRS 123.050, the separate property of a spouse nor the spouse’s share of the community property is liable for the debts of the other. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  21. Tex. Fam. Code 3.003, Presumption of Community Property. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  22. Tex. Fam. Code 3.104, Protection of Third Persons. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  23. Cal. Fam. Code 760, California Code, Family Code - FAM § 760. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  24. Cal. Evid. Code 662, California Code, Evidence Code - EVID § 662. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  25. Cal. Fam. Code 2581, California Code, Family Code - FAM § 2581. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  26. Wis. Stat. 766.60, 765 to 770) § 766.60. Optional forms of holding property; survivorship ownership. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back
  27. Wis. Stat. 806.15, 799 to 847) § 806.15. Lien of judgment; priority; statute may be suspended. Read the section, opens in a new tab Back